RunUO 2.0 RC 1 Intrest System

[Murzin]

RunUO 2.0 RC 1 Intrest System ( & final )

Ok, most intrest systems i have seen fail to take some things into account.

1) current intrest rate is 1g per 1,000 g in bank in loose coinage and checks in top level and containers

2) will not give intrest if they have not logged in in the last 30 days

3) will not give intrest if they are banned

majority of it is commented with whats happening at each step.

Version: 1.0, initial release
Version: 1.1, functioning recursive search for gold/checks, tested to 5 sub-containers
Version: 1.2, post #18

verified compile in 2.0 final version

for the 2.0 final version, its the one down below #18

 

[Liacs]

Sounds good. I got an older interest system. But I think it doesn't take into account the banning and the logging time... (I think )

Thanks!

Lia

 

[arul]

if( item is Container )  // begin recursive check of all containers

This is not a recursion. Recursion is calling a function from within its body.
Your code will check only 1st and 2nd level containers.

You can simply use the code that's already in Container.cs and do it effeciently in a two-line fashion.

int totalGold = ibb.GetAmount(typeof(Gold));
Array.ForEach<BankCheck>( ibb.FindItemsByType(typeof(BankCheck)), delegate( BankCheck check ){ totalGold += check.Worth; });

 

[Murzin]

the list function is actually the recursive check... i tested it with 3 nested containers and it worked properly

 

[arul]

What do you mean by the list function?

It checks only the top level (bank box itself) and then the next level(one-level nested container), because it doesn't do a recursive search.

In the attached image you can see that it doesn't work. It checks the containers highlighted in gray, but not the one in red.

 

[Murzin]

ok, new release, version 1.1 including a recursive search tested to 5 sub-packs inside a bank box.

 

[Joeku]

Sounds good. I got an older interest system.

Hm ya.

 

[Murzin]

nothing to contribute eh joe!!! get on aim damn you, i miss ya!

 

[Liacs]

@Joeku: Are you mocking me? Then you are making a fool of yourself... because intErest is right
Have a look into the next dictionary!

Lia

 

[Joeku]

@Joeku: Are you mocking me? Then you are making a fool of yourself... because intErest is right
Have a look into the next dictionary!

Lia

I was mocking Murzin lol <3

 

[Macil]

Ok, most intrest systems i have seen fail to take some things into account.

1) current intrest rate is 1g per 1,000 g in bank in loose coinage and checks in top level and containers

2) will not give intrest if they have not logged in in the last 30 days

3) will not give intrest if they are banned

majority of it is commented with whats happening at each step.

Version: 1.0, initial release
Version: 1.1, functioning recursive search for gold/checks, tested to 5 sub-containers

I was wondering if perhaps you could add a feature to this so that the interest system is excluded per account level? I like to keep my Admin well stocked with gold but after a few days the gold in my bank box got a bit out of hand with the Admin. I don't know about anyone else but if Admins or Staff were excluded from the interest system it might make things easier.

Its not really a big deal, I was just wondering.

 

[Murzin]

if ( mob.BankBox != null && ( ((PlayerMobile)mob).LastOnline + inttime ) > DateTime.Now && !((PlayerMobile)mob).Account.Banned )

change that to:

if ( mob.BankBox != null && ( ((PlayerMobile)mob).LastOnline + inttime ) > DateTime.Now && !((PlayerMobile)mob).Account.Banned && from.AccessLevel == AccessLevel.Player )

that should fix it

 

[Macil]

After modifying it like you said to exclude staff I get this error.

Errors:
 + !Custom Scripts/intrest.cs:
    CS0103: Line 42: The name 'from' does not exist in the current context

Whats it mean? Heh.

 

[Liacs]

replace the from by mob and it should be fine.

Have fun!

Lia

 

[Axhind]

I had an older version of an interest system, and saw this one and figured I'd give it a try. I keep getting this following error.

Line 42: 'Server.Accounting.IAccount' does not contain a definition for 'Banned'

It seems that things have changed in the few years that I've been away.

-Axhind

 

[greywolf79]

I cannot remember if I posted on here before... But this package is awesome. I have it installed on my rc1 shard... Anyone know if it is compatible with rc2?

GreyWolf.

 

[Axhind]

I have File Version 2.0.2959.20979 and I keep getting the above error.

 

[Murzin]

i fixxed the error and now i have that error gone...


let me know if you have problems with this

 

[Prophet2005]

is there anyway to make this charge the player instead of giving them money making them pay money

 

[sexylady]

who can i change the 1g per 1000 to 5g eg and on what line plz